AIIC AI Intelligence Centre

SOURCE-LINKED INTELLIGENCE

World Models for Cross-Machine CNC Transfer under Partial Sensor Overlap

arXiv · AI, language, vision and robotics · article · Sep 13, 2026 · UTC

Industrial world models must move between machines whose dynamics, sensing interfaces and command conventions differ. This study asks whether a command-conditioned latent world model, trained to predict future representations of the process rather than to reconstruct future samples, keeps its value on a machine it has never seen: a source CNC machine exposes 17 sensor channels, the target sharing 10 of those. All model selection uses source data only, and the locked configuration is evaluated on the target once. Two findings follow. First, latent-predictive pretraining brings no in-domain fore

Read original source ↗ Open in workspace

recordType
paper
region
Global

Evidence & attribution

First collected: 2026-09-20T12:21:05.240Z. This is not the publication date.

Observed changes

AIIC observation times, not verified publisher revision times. Up to eight recent revisions.

2026-09-24T12:12:29.144Z

  • title: Schema-Adaptive Action-Conditioned JEPA for Cross-Machine CNC Transfer under Partial Sensor Overlap → World Models for Cross-Machine CNC Transfer under Partial Sensor Overlap
  • summary: Cross-machine deployment of industrial world models requires transfer across changes in dynamics, sensing interfaces, sampling regimes, and control units. We study a schema-adaptive action-conditioned Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture (SAAC-JEPA) for CNC dynamics, where the source machine has 17 canonical sensor channels and the target shares only 10. Evaluation uses group-disjoint source splits, source-only normalization, held-out self-supervised validation, unit audits, and a sealed target test after model locking. Across five seeds, JEPA pretraining gives no clean-source forecasting g → Industrial world models must move between machines whose dynamics, sensing interfaces and command conventions differ. This study asks whether a command-conditioned latent world model, trained to predict future representations of the process rather than to reconstruct future samples, keeps its value on a machine it has never seen: a source CNC machine exposes 17 sensor channels, the target sharing 10 of those. All model selection uses source data only, and the locked configuration is evaluated on the target once. Two findings follow. First, latent-predictive pretraining brings no in-domain fore