SOURCE-LINKED INTELLIGENCE
VERPO: Verified Evidence Regularized Policy Optimization
arXiv · AI, language, vision and robotics · article · Sep 5, 2026 · UTC
Verifiable rewards improve language models through reliable task-level feedback, but methods based on Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) apply a sequence-level advantage uniformly across all tokens. This coarse credit assignment reinforces or penalizes entire responses without identifying which local decisions to preserve, reinforce, or revise. Conversely, evidence-conditioned self-distillation provides denser token-level supervision, yet teacher imitation can transfer stylistic artifacts and miscalibrated confidence that destabilize training when misaligned with task success. We introd
Read original source ↗ Open in workspace
- recordType
- paper
- region
- Global
Evidence & attribution
First collected: 2026-09-20T21:32:07.623Z. This is not the publication date.
Observed changes
AIIC observation times, not verified publisher revision times. Up to eight recent revisions.
2026-09-25T18:52:32.462Z
- summary:
Verifiable outcome rewards guide language-model post-training, but sequence-level advantages do not identify which token-level decisions should be preserved or revised. Evidence-conditioned Teachers provide denser supervision by replaying sampled trajectories with privileged feedback. Yet indiscriminate imitation risks transferring formatting or reasoning-style shifts that do not support task success. We introduce VERPO, a Verified Evidence Regularized Policy Optimization framework that treats evidence as a proposal for policy correction while retaining the outcome objective. It separates evid → Verifiable rewards improve language models through reliable task-level feedback, but methods based on Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) apply a sequence-level advantage uniformly across all tokens. This coarse credit assignment reinforces or penalizes entire responses without identifying which local decisions to preserve, reinforce, or revise. Conversely, evidence-conditioned self-distillation provides denser token-level supervision, yet teacher imitation can transfer stylistic artifacts and miscalibrated confidence that destabilize training when misaligned with task success. We introd