SOURCE-LINKED INTELLIGENCE
Generative vs. Encoder Large Language Models for ASR Evaluation: A Comparative Study
Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) is typically evaluated using Word Error Rate (WER), which poorly reflects semantic similarity. While embedding-based metrics correlate better with human judgments, the respective roles of encoder and decoder-based Large Language Models (LLMs) remain underexplored. This paper presents a comparative study of both families for ASR evaluation. We analyze BERTScore and SemDist across different LLMs, layers, and pooling strategies, showing that both metrics can achieve strong correlation with human judgments when properly configured. For decoder models, we investig
Read original source ↗ Open in workspace
- recordType
- paper
- region
- Global
Evidence & attribution
- arXiv · AI, language, vision and robotics · 2026-08-26T09:36:48.000Z
First collected: 2026-09-21T09:22:01.459Z. This is not the publication date.