SOURCE-LINKED INTELLIGENCE
Optimal Recovery Meets Bayesian Learning: Where Worst-Case Bounds Pay Off
Worst-case Optimal Recovery (OR) and Bayesian learning describe the same Gaussian-quadratic-Hilbert problems in two vocabularies. We sharpen the correspondence - the radius of information equals a nugget-optimized GP posterior variance and is attained by the posterior mean at a closed-form balance nugget - and measure, inside three published Bayesian systems, where the worst-case side pays. The ledger is two-sided: the losses instruct as much as the wins. Morozov calibration tracks a test-access oracle within $1.00$-$1.19\times$ where $σ$-blind rules fail, is $4.9$-$6.3\times$ more reproducibl
Read original source ↗ Open in workspace
- recordType
- paper
- region
- Global
Evidence & attribution
- arXiv · AI, language, vision and robotics · 2026-08-29T01:47:05.000Z
First collected: 2026-09-26T21:41:48.575Z. This is not the publication date.