SOURCE-LINKED INTELLIGENCE
Are LLMs Good Financial User Simulators? Multi-view Investor Logic Alignment (MILA)
arXiv · AI, language, vision and robotics · article · Sep 14, 2026 · UTC
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as user simulators, yet it remains unclear whether their predictions faithfully reproduce the evolving decisions of individual users. We investigate this question in a controlled longitudinal paper-trading study with 80 participants, where user interactions, simulated transactions, virtual portfolio states, and point-in-time market information are aligned under a rolling next-day prediction protocol. We evaluate behavioral fidelity hierarchically, from trade occurrence to action structure, asset selection, and downstream portfolio consequences
Read original source ↗ Open in workspace
- recordType
- paper
- region
- Global
Evidence & attribution
First collected: 2026-09-20T09:41:04.278Z. This is not the publication date.
Observed changes
AIIC observation times, not verified publisher revision times. Up to eight recent revisions.
2026-09-24T06:32:24.425Z
- title:
Are LLMs Good Financial User Simulators? A Preliminary Study → Are LLMs Good Financial User Simulators? Multi-view Investor Logic Alignment (MILA) - summary:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as user simulators, but their ability to reproduce evolving individual financial decisions remains unclear. We present a preliminary study in a controlled paper-trading environment with 120 volunteers. Participants used non-redeemable virtual funds under real-time market conditions; no real brokerage accounts, real-money positions, or real transaction records were accessed. Given only information available before a prediction cutoff, a simulator predicts the participant's next-trading-day action, traded security, and transaction quantity. We e → Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as user simulators, yet it remains unclear whether their predictions faithfully reproduce the evolving decisions of individual users. We investigate this question in a controlled longitudinal paper-trading study with 80 participants, where user interactions, simulated transactions, virtual portfolio states, and point-in-time market information are aligned under a rolling next-day prediction protocol. We evaluate behavioral fidelity hierarchically, from trade occurrence to action structure, asset selection, and downstream portfolio consequences