SOURCE-LINKED INTELLIGENCE
Improving Randomized Metric Distortion to 2.1441
In metric social choice, voters rank candidates by their distances in an unknown metric space. A voting rule uses these rankings to select a candidate or a lottery over candidates, aiming to minimize the average distance to voters. Distortion measures the worst-case approximation ratio. While the best distortion of deterministic rules is $3$, prior work pins down the best distortion of randomized rules to $[2.1126,2.5]$. We improve the upper bound to $2.1441$, closing over $90\%$ of this gap. The proof introduces random-size stable lotteries, proves their existence, and derives the new bound t
Read original source ↗ Open in workspace
- recordType
- paper
- region
- Global
Evidence & attribution
- arXiv · AI, language, vision and robotics · 2026-08-29T14:49:28.000Z
First collected: 2026-09-21T07:51:58.603Z. This is not the publication date.