AIIC AI Intelligence Centre

SOURCE-LINKED INTELLIGENCE

Measuring the Creativity of Frontier LLMs in Automated Research

arXiv · AI, language, vision and robotics · article · Sep 12, 2026 · UTC

Frontier LLMs are increasingly capable of conducting automated research, yet their creativity in this setting has not been systematically evaluated. We propose a set of metrics to evaluate creativity along the two dimensions of valueness and novelty. Valueness assesses whether each proposed idea is useful, while novelty is evaluated from three perspectives: whether the same idea has appeared before (Exact-Match P-Novelty), whether the modified variable or variable combination has been explored before (Variable-level P-Novelty), which reflects the breadth of research-space exploration, and whet

Read original source ↗ Open in workspace

recordType
paper
region
Global

Evidence & attribution

First collected: 2026-09-20T12:41:04.663Z. This is not the publication date.

Observed changes

AIIC observation times, not verified publisher revision times. Up to eight recent revisions.

2026-09-24T14:02:34.369Z

  • summary: Frontier LLMs are increasingly capable of conducting automated research, yet their creativity in this setting has not been systematically evaluated. In this paper, we propose a set of metrics to evaluate creativity along the two dimensions of valueness and novelty. Valueness assesses whether each proposed idea is useful, while novelty is evaluated from three perspectives: whether the same idea has appeared before (Exact-Match P-Novelty), whether a previously unexplored variable or variable combination is explored (Variable-level P-Novelty), and whether the idea directly follows retrieved exter → Frontier LLMs are increasingly capable of conducting automated research, yet their creativity in this setting has not been systematically evaluated. We propose a set of metrics to evaluate creativity along the two dimensions of valueness and novelty. Valueness assesses whether each proposed idea is useful, while novelty is evaluated from three perspectives: whether the same idea has appeared before (Exact-Match P-Novelty), whether the modified variable or variable combination has been explored before (Variable-level P-Novelty), which reflects the breadth of research-space exploration, and whet