AIIC AI Intelligence Centre

SOURCE-LINKED INTELLIGENCE

When Greedy Sampling Explores: KL-Regularized Contextual Bandits without Eluder-Dimension Dependence

arXiv · AI, language, vision and robotics · article · Sep 11, 2026 · UTC

We study KL-regularized contextual bandits under both reward and preference feedback. While existing regret guarantees typically depend on the eluder dimension, we show that simple greedy sampling can achieve polylogarithmic regret without explicit dependence on this complexity measure. For reward feedback, we analyze a greedy algorithm that samples directly from the Gibbs policy induced by the estimated reward. We extend the result to preference feedback under both general preference and Bradley--Terry models, while also sharpening existing dimension-dependent guarantees. Our analysis reveals

Read original source ↗ Open in workspace

recordType
paper
region
Global

Evidence & attribution

First collected: 2026-09-20T16:41:15.630Z. This is not the publication date.

Observed changes

AIIC observation times, not verified publisher revision times. Up to eight recent revisions.

2026-09-24T14:02:34.369Z

  • summary: We study KL-regularized contextual bandits under both reward and preference feedback. We show that greedy sampling can achieve logarithmic regret without explicit dependence on the eluder dimension. For reward feedback, we establish an eluder-dimension-independent regret bound for a simple greedy algorithm that directly samples from the Gibbs policy induced by the estimated reward. We further extend this result to preference feedback under both the general preference and Bradley--Terry models, while also sharpening existing dimension-dependent guarantees. Our analysis reveals a trade-off betwe → We study KL-regularized contextual bandits under both reward and preference feedback. While existing regret guarantees typically depend on the eluder dimension, we show that simple greedy sampling can achieve polylogarithmic regret without explicit dependence on this complexity measure. For reward feedback, we analyze a greedy algorithm that samples directly from the Gibbs policy induced by the estimated reward. We extend the result to preference feedback under both general preference and Bradley--Terry models, while also sharpening existing dimension-dependent guarantees. Our analysis reveals