AIIC AI Intelligence Centre

SOURCE-LINKED INTELLIGENCE

HearInContext: A Benchmark for Implicit Context in Speech Recognition

arXiv · AI, language, vision and robotics · article · Sep 16, 2026 · UTC

Contextual ASR can benefit from semantic cues or from target words explicitly provided in the context. We introduce HearInContext, a Mandarin-English benchmark that pairs shared synthetic speech with assistant replies supporting different interpretations. The benchmark comprises 3,764 semantic test cases built around homophones. Implicit contexts exclude candidate words; explicit contexts name the target. No-context and unrelated-context controls measure the benefit of relevant history and sensitivity to irrelevant history. Context-capable models benefit from implicit cues but achieve higher t

Read original source ↗ Open in workspace

recordType
paper
region
Global

Evidence & attribution

First collected: 2026-09-19T20:28:26.698Z. This is not the publication date.

Observed changes

AIIC observation times, not verified publisher revision times. Up to eight recent revisions.

2026-09-23T18:11:26.115Z

  • summary: Contextual ASR can benefit from semantic cues or from target words explicitly provided in the context. We introduce HearInContext, a Mandarin--English benchmark that pairs shared synthetic speech with assistant replies supporting different interpretations. The benchmark comprises 3,764 semantic test cases built around homophones. Implicit contexts exclude candidate words; explicit contexts name the target. No-context and unrelated-context controls measure the benefit of relevant history and sensitivity to irrelevant history. Context-capable models benefit from implicit cues but achieve higher → Contextual ASR can benefit from semantic cues or from target words explicitly provided in the context. We introduce HearInContext, a Mandarin-English benchmark that pairs shared synthetic speech with assistant replies supporting different interpretations. The benchmark comprises 3,764 semantic test cases built around homophones. Implicit contexts exclude candidate words; explicit contexts name the target. No-context and unrelated-context controls measure the benefit of relevant history and sensitivity to irrelevant history. Context-capable models benefit from implicit cues but achieve higher t