SOURCE-LINKED INTELLIGENCE
Not What You Meant: Can LLMs Follow a Specified Negation Semantics?
Negation does not carry a uniform interpretation across domains. In legal, regulatory, and medical reasoning, the intended interpretation depends on the reading in force -- open- versus closed-world, two- versus three-valued, and credulous versus skeptical. We study which reading of negation large language models adopt by default and whether they can override that preference when a different reading is explicitly specified. To this end, we introduce NAFBench, a procedural generator of solver-certified instances spanning four semantic viewpoints: SLDNF, well-founded semantics (WFS), and credulo
Read original source ↗ Open in workspace
- recordType
- paper
- region
- Global
Evidence & attribution
- arXiv · AI, language, vision and robotics · 2026-09-23T08:14:47.000Z
First collected: 2026-09-24T01:22:21.678Z. This is not the publication date.