SOURCE-LINKED INTELLIGENCE
Conformity Breaks Conformal Prediction
A conformal certificate can be valid when an LLM answers alone and invalid when the same LLM sees peers that unanimously assert a wrong answer. The question is unchanged; the model's score for the correct answer changes. We call this a score-mechanism shift: clean calibration certifies how the model scores answers alone, but not how it scores them under peer pressure. We show that this shift silently breaks conformal prediction in multi-agent LLM systems. Across open-weight models and multiple-choice QA tasks, coverage falls from a calibrated 90% to 74% under unanimous-wrong peers at the stand
Read original source ↗ Open in workspace
- recordType
- paper
- region
- Global
Evidence & attribution
- arXiv · AI, language, vision and robotics · 2026-09-03T20:05:47.000Z
First collected: 2026-09-21T04:31:57.454Z. This is not the publication date.