SOURCE-LINKED INTELLIGENCE
Same Scores, Different Decisions: Evaluating JEV and Language Models for Legal Document Understanding
Contract inference requires multiple judgments about a shared document, but aggregate accuracy can conceal changes in the individual decisions. Repeated agreement is also insufficient: a model may consistently return the wrong answer. In this paper, we compare Jev with nine language models on ContractNLI, evaluating inference cost, response time, average correctness, and correctness across repeated request conditions. Controlled comparisons vary hypothesis visibility, requested outputs, and output order while keeping the contract and target judgment fixed. Jev has the lowest cost and median re
Read original source ↗ Open in workspace
- recordType
- paper
- region
- Global
Evidence & attribution
- arXiv · AI, language, vision and robotics · 2026-09-23T10:53:01.000Z
First collected: 2026-09-24T01:22:21.678Z. This is not the publication date.