SOURCE-LINKED INTELLIGENCE
A Formal Methodological Framework for Auditing Robustness and Fidelity in Explainable AI: From Application to Trust Certification
SHAP and LIME are now standard tools for interpreting black-box predictions, yet their outputs can vary substantially when the input is perturbed by small amounts of noise--a problem we observed firsthand in our previous work on food security in Madagascar (Ralinirina et al., 2025). This variability raises the question of whether such explanations can be trusted at all. We address it by constructing an auditing protocol that measures two properties of any post-hoc explainer: robustness (how stable the explanation is under input perturbation) and fidelity (whether the features deemed important
Read original source ↗ Open in workspace
- recordType
- paper
- region
- Global
Evidence & attribution
- arXiv · AI, language, vision and robotics · 2026-08-24T20:54:04.000Z
First collected: 2026-09-21T10:22:00.206Z. This is not the publication date.