SOURCE-LINKED INTELLIGENCE
Does a model's stated reason for rejecting a candidate do any work?
Asked to choose between candidates and explain the choice, a language model often rejects a rival by naming a fact its profile lacks: no director, no date of death. That sentence is a claim about the text in front of the model, and it can be tested without any judge. We insert a real corpus sentence stating the named fact into the rival's profile and ask again under greedy decoding. Two controls separate content from placement: a length-matched irrelevant sentence at the same profile, and the same two sentences at a third option the model never mentioned. In the largest of three runs, six open
Read original source ↗ Open in workspace
- recordType
- paper
- region
- Global
Evidence & attribution
- arXiv · AI, language, vision and robotics · 2026-09-24T17:13:35.000Z
First collected: 2026-09-25T06:12:46.948Z. This is not the publication date.